Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 1 Comparison of the Parzen-Rosenblatt Window and Naïve Bayes methods

From: Predicting the mechanism of phospholipidosis

Partition No. PRW Rank NB Rank
1 17.049 74.104
2 16.343 76.251
3 18.424 79.078
4 16.212 73.539
5 17.339 73.535
6 18.630 77.244
7 20.694 78.560
8 18.870 74.464
9 16.584 76.235
10 18.200 78.077
Average 17.835 76.109
  1. Average ranks of known targets as predicted in the 10-fold cross-validation by the Parzen-Rosenblatt Window [18] and by a Naïve Bayes method [19]. The Parzen-Rosenblatt Window, using h = 2-3, consistently assigns better ranks to the known targets, its predicted ranks being numerically smaller by a factor of 4.3.