Skip to main content

Table 6 Δ EF values for HMGR

From: Improving structural similarity based virtual screening using background knowledge

Query vs. DB

MCS

MCS ext

 

1%

5%

10%

1%

5%

10%

stat vs DuD all

63.5 ± 14.1

10.1 ± 3.7

4.5 ± 2.3

16.7 ± 18.3

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

stat vs DuD set

61.2 ± 13.6

9.4 ± 4.4

3.1 ± 2.2

28.9 ± 26.1

1.7 ± 1.8

0.0 ± 0.0

 lig vs DuD all

14.1 ± 1.7

1.1 ± 0.3

0.0 ± 0.1

3.1 ± 0.7

0.3 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.0

 lig vs DuD set

0.0 ± 0.0

2.1 ± 0.5

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

1.7 ± 0.2

0.0 ± 0.0

 

ECFP

ECFP ext

 

1%

5%

10%

1%

5%

10%

stat vs DuD all

50.0 ± 0.0

10.0 ± 0.0

5.0 ± 0.0

8.3 ± 20.4

1.7 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

stat vs DuD set

52.0 ± 0.0

10.1 ± 0.0

5.0 ± 0.0

20.2 ± 20.2

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

 lig vs DuD all

6.1 ± 1.2

1.4 ± 0.2

0.1 ± 0.1

5.9 ± 1.5

1.4 ± 0.3

0.0 ± 0.0

 lig vs DuD set

0.1 ± 0.1

0.9 ± 0.2

0.0 ± 0.0

0.0 ± 0.0

0.4 ± 0.1

0.0 ± 0.0

  1. Δ EF value for all four similarity methods for the hand-selection experiments with HMGR at 1%, 5% and 10% of the database. Improvements compared to the non-extended variant are marked in bold print. stat = statines.