Table 4 Average enrichment in the simulated target-prediction experiment when training with random negatives
From: Accurate and efficient target prediction using a potency-sensitive influence-relevance voter
Enrichment (%) | PS-IRV | SVM | RF |
|---|---|---|---|
\(1\,\upmu \hbox {M}\) cutoff | |||
 5 | 96 | 92 | 95 |
 10 | 98 | 94 | 96 |
 20 | 98 | 97 | 97 |
 30 | 99 | 98 | 97 |
\(5\,\upmu \hbox {M}\) cutoff | |||
 5 | 95 | 92 | 95 |
 10 | 97 | 94 | 96 |
 20 | 98 | 97 | 97 |
 30 | 98 | 98 | 97 |
\(10\,\upmu \hbox {M}\) cutoff | |||
 5 | 94 | 94 | 93 |
 10 | 96 | 95 | 96 |
 20 | 97 | 97 | 97 |
 30 | 97 | 98 | 97 |