Fig. 9
From: Comparing structural fingerprints using a literature-based similarity benchmark
Histograms showing the relative performance of a subset of the fingerprints relative to the HashTT fingerprint in the multi-assay benchmark. Relative performance was measured for each of the 1000 repetitions by counting the number of times a particular fingerprint had higher correlation with the benchmark series compared to the HashTT fingerprint and subtracting the number of times it had lower correlation. The difference between the performance of the FCFP4 and HashTT fingerprints was not found to be statistically significant. All others fingerprints shown were either better (those to the right) or worse (those to the left) than HashTT. A bin width of 10 was used