# | Na
| CLSb
| #Rankc
| nd
| SRe
|
---|
MDBSA
| MDF
|
---|
1a | 68 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 11 |
1bg
| 74 | 5 | 1 | – | 4 | 19 |
1cg
| 71 | 6 | 1 | – | 5 | 14 |
2 | 300 | 18 | 2 | 4 | 13 | 23 |
3a | 222 | 46 | 3 | 4 | 21 | 11 |
3b | 222 | 46 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 11 |
4 h
| 155 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 19 |
5 | 143 | 25 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 12 |
6i
| 116 | 26 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 10 |
7 | 123 | 26 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 10 |
8 | 106 | 25 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 11 |
9j
| 92 | 23 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 9 |
10 | 49 | 11 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 12 |
-
aTotal count of ligand copies after Wrapper
-
bCount of ligands surviving the Shaker, after MDBSA
-
cRank serial number of the structure with the best RMSD value, after MDBSA and after MDF
-
dCount of cluster representatives (final solutions) Shaker
-
eShaker Rate
-
fTotal computational time required for MDB, MDBSA and MDF, as explained in Additional file 2: Table S12
-
gFor System 1, WnS was performed with different seeds for data reproduction purposes
-
hFinal clustering was done using van der Waals and Coulomb interactions due to interactions of zinc ion with the ligand
-
iWrapper process was done, using the LJ interaction as a scoring function, instead of AD4 (Additional file 2: Table S13)
-
jFinal clustering was done with 6 Å distance limit between clusters