Skip to main content

Table 1 Results from the decoration process of the DRD2 molecules on the five validation set scaffolds

From: SMILES-based deep generative scaffold decorator for de-novo drug design

S

Generated

ChEMBL decoys

DRD2 decoys

Total

% act.

% act.

% diff

EOR

% act.

% diff

EOR

1

1728

64.5

0.9

63.6

67.7

4.2

60.3

15.5

2

1626

52.4

8.3

44.1

6.3

19.7

32.7

2.7

3

10,666

35.6

0.8

34.8

46.3

16.2

19.4

2.2

4

262

84.7

0.4

84.3

236.1

0.9

83.8

89.0

5

18

88.9

7.8

81.1

11.3

10.1

78.8

8.8

  1. Total number of molecules sampled (Total); percent of generated molecules that are predicted as active (\(p_{active} \ge 0.5\)) by the APM (% act); for both the decoys decorated with ChEMBL fragments and DRD2 fragments from the training set: percent of predicted active decoys (\(p_{active} \ge 0.5\)) (% act); difference between the generated predicted active percent and the predicted active percent of the decoys (% Diff); Enrichment Over Random (\(percent_{active} /percent_{decoy}\)) (EOR)