Skip to main content

Table 3 Comparison of the effectiveness of property targeting task

From: DeepGraphMolGen, a multi-objective, computational strategy for generating molecules with desirable properties: a graph convolution and reinforcement learning approach

Method

−2.5 ≤ logP ≤ − 2

5 ≤ logP ≤ 5.5

150 ≤ MW ≤ 200

500 ≤ MW ≤ 550

Success

Diversity

Success

Diversity

Success

Diversity

Success

Diversity

ZINC

0.3%

0.919

1.3%

0.909

1.7%

0.938

0

–

ORGAN

0

–

0.2%

0.909

15.1%

0.759

0.1%

0.907

JT-VAE

11.3%

0.846

7.6%

0.907

0.7%

0.824

16.0%

0.898

GCPN

85.5%

0.392

54.7%

0.855

76.1%

0.921

74.1%

0.920

  1. MW here stands for the Molecular Weight. Success is defined as the percentage of generated molecules in the target range and Diversity is defined as the average pairwise Tanimoto distance between the Morgan fingerprints of the molecules. Citations to ORGAN and JT-VAE are given in the legend to Table 2
  2. Italics values refer to the best results among the methods compared