Skip to main content

Table 2 The \({\text{R}}^{2}\) between the actual solubility scores and those predicted by GraphSol based on individual feature groups, removing each feature group from the final GraphSol model, and recursively adding feature groups according to their importance, respectively

From: Structure-aware protein solubility prediction from sequence through graph convolutional network and predicted contact map

Feature groupsa

CVd

Ind. test

Feature groupsb

CVd

Ind. test

Features groupsc

CVd

Ind. test

–

–

–

GraphSol

0.476 \(\pm \) 0.014

0.483

–

–

–

BLOSUM

0.329 \(\pm \) 0.016

0.317

− BLOSUM

0.460 \(\pm \) 0.011

0.465

BLOSUM

0.329 \(\pm \) 0.016

0.317

AAPHY7

0.293 \(\pm \) 0.014

0.289

− AAPHY7

0.465 \(\pm \) 0.012

0.479

+ SPIDER3

0.413 \(\pm \) 0.012

0.409

PSSM

0.333 \(\pm \) 0.012

0.332

− PSSM

0.457 \(\pm \) 0.017

0.467

+ PSSM

0.456 \(\pm \) 0.011

0.453

HMM

0.337 \(\pm \) 0.015

0.341

− HMM

0.455 \(\pm \) 0.016

0.458

+ HMM

0.465 \(\pm \) 0.012

0.479

SPIDER3

0.231 \(\pm \) 0.019

0.227

− SPIDER3

0.428 \(\pm \) 0.018

0.449

+ AAPHY7

0.476 \(\pm \) 0.014

0.483

  1. Italic values indicate the performance of using all feature groups in our model
  2. a Performances based on individual feature groups
  3. b by removing each feature group from all feature
  4. c by adding feature groups recursively
  5. d Performances by the fivefold cross-validation