Skip to main content

Table 7 Performance of the RF models on the two test sets when the cutoff is 20%

From: HobPre: accurate prediction of human oral bioavailability for small molecules

Data set

Model

SE

SP

ACC

AUC

MCC

F1-score

Test set 1

(287)

Model 1

0.370

0.869

0.742

0.736

0.264

0.824

Model 2

0.479

0.864

0.767

0.767

0.360

0.847

Model 3

0.452

0.893

0.780

0.771

0.379

0.858

Model 4

0.452

0.856

0.746

0.759

0.308

0.832

Model 5

0.493

0.855

0.763

0.789

0.359

0.833

Consensus model

0.493

0.925

0.815

0.801

0.473

0.882

Test set 2

(133)

Model 1

0.8

0.891

0.887

0.973

0.384

0.938

Model 2

1

0.859

0.865

0.978

0.432

0.924

Model 3

0.8

0.883

0.880

0.939

0.371

0.933

Model 4

1

0.914

0.917

0.955

0.534

0.955

Model 5

1

0.898

0.902

0.973

0.499

0.946

Consensus model

1

0.906

0.910

0.981

0.516

0.951

  1. Bold numbers refer to the maximum value (optimum value) obtained from the corresponding evaluation index