Skip to main content

Table 2 Performance comparison on property prediction of small molecules (regression tasks)

From: Force field-inspired molecular representation learning for property prediction

Metric

RMSE ↓

MAE ↓

Dataset

ESOL

Lipophilicity

FreeSolv

QM9

SVM

1.128 (0.081)

0.785 (0.032)

2.283 (0.324)

–a

RF

1.206 (0.034)

0.859 (0.030)

2.093 (0.566)

14.584 (0.047)

GATv2

0.578 (0.031)

0.618 (0.014)

1.017 (0.122)

3.449 (0.146)

GIN

0.619 (0.044)

0.756 (0.007)

1.136 (0.235)

4.972 (0.263)

GCN

0.778 (0.101)

0.899 (0.035)

1.582 (0.325)

10.158 (0.236)

DMPNN

0.665 (0.052)

0.596 (0.050)

1.167 (0.150)

3.101 (0.010)

DimeNet

0.730 (0.154)

0.699 (0.096)

0.890 (0.191)

0.748 (0.065)

FFiNet

0.551 (0.030)

0.579 (0.022)

0.756 (0.138)

1.803 (0.102)

  1. The SOTA results are shown in bold. Standard deviations are in brackets
  2. aAs SVM on QM9 is too time-consuming, we could not finish on time