Skip to main content

Table 4 Comparisons of performance with state-of-the-art methods on classification datasets, splitting the datasets by random splitting in a ratio of 8:1:1 (higher values are better)

From: Double-head transformer neural network for molecular property prediction

Methods

PCBA

BACE

Tox21

SIDER

MolNet [1]

\(0.136 \pm 0.004\)

/

\(0.829 \pm 0.006\)

\(0.648 \pm 0.009\)

RF on Morgan [19]

/

\(0.825 \pm 0.039\)

\(0.619 \pm 0.015\)

\(0.572 \pm 0.007\)

FFN on Morgan [19]

\(0.263 \pm 0.008\)

\(0.873 \pm 0.040\)

\(0.788 \pm 0.017\)

\(0.652 \pm 0.010\)

FFN on Morgan Counts [19]

\(0.268 \pm 0.006\)

\(0.882 \pm 0.030\)

\(0.790 \pm 0.020\)

\(0.638 \pm 0.020\)

FFN on RDKit [19]

\(0.207 \pm 0.005\)

\(0.858 \pm 0.034\)

\(0.832 \pm 0.016\)

\(0.654 \pm 0.019\)

DMPNN [19]

\(0.769 \pm 0.010\)

\(0.892 \pm 0.031\)

\(0.839 \pm 0.022\)

\(0.657 \pm 0.016\)

Ours

\({{ {0.821}}} \pm {{ {0.005}}}\)

\({{{0.923}}} \pm {{ {0.035}}}\)

\({{ {0.847}}} \pm {{{0.015}}}\)

\({{ {0.679}}} \pm {{ {0.015}}}\)