Skip to main content

Table 3 Success rates (%) for the evaluation of ranking power ranked by high-level results on optimized structures

From: DLIGAND2: an improved knowledge-based energy function for protein–ligand interactions using the distance-scaled, finite, ideal-gas reference state

Score function

Success rates (%) on crystal structures

Success rates (%) on optimized structures

High-level

Low-level

High-level

Low-level

X-ScoreHM

58.5

72.3

56.9

73.8

ChemScore@SYBYL

53.8

67.7

52.3

69.2

D-Score@SYBYL

49.2

63.1

52.3

63.1

LigScore1@DS

52.3

61.5

50.8

63.1

ΔSAS

49.2

67.7

50.8

69.2

DLIGAND2

50.8

63.1

49.2

64.6

PLP2@DS

55.4

72.3

47.7

67.7

Alpha-HB@MOE

52.3

66.2

47.7

64.6

ChemPLP@GOLD

58.5

72.3

46.2

61.5

G-Score@SYBYL

52.3

72.3

46.2

61.5

DLIGAND

49.2

63.1

46.2

64.6

PMF@DS

49.2

66.2

46.2

63.1

LUDI1@DS

52.3

69.2

44.6

66.2

Jain@DS

41.5

58.5

44.6

63.1

GoldScore@GOLD

55.4

76.9

43.1

66.2

ASE@MOE

40

64.6

43.1

63.1

London-dG@MOE

43.1

60

40

60

ASP@GOLD

47.7

72.3

38.5

60

Affinity-dG@MOE

53.8

66.2

36.9

50.8

ChemScore@GOLD

46.2

63.1

33.8

53.8

GlideScore-XP

35.4

47.7

32.3

46.2

PMF@SYBYL

43.1

61.5

30.8

53.8

GlideScore-SP

43.1

56.9

21.5

38.5

  1. Results (excluding DLIGAND2 and DIGAND) cited from Li [5]