Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparing RegioSQM implementations

From: RegioSQM20: improved prediction of the regioselectivity of electrophilic aromatic substitutions

Methodology

Corr/Semi/Fail

Median CPU time (s)\(^{\text{a}}\)

Mean CPU time (s)\(^{\text{a}}\)

Total CPU time (h)\(^{\text{a,b}}\)

RegioSQM18

488/30/17

42

127

10

GFN1-xTB/methanol

486/27/22

60

230

17

FF Optimization

485/29/21

33

110

8

Tautomers (canonical RDKit)

477/28/30

33

110

8

Tautomers (lowest energy)

483/27/25

39

163

12

Tautomers (15 kcal/mol)

496/21/18

49

223

17

  1. The last entry corresponds to RegioSQM20. For the generation of the conformers, a random seed of 90 was used. Furthermore, the RegioSQM18 and GFN1-xTB/methanol entries uses ETversion=1 and otherwise ETversion=2. Corr/Semi/Fail is defined in Fig. 4
  2. \(^{\text{a}}\)4 cores/molecule (Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5550 @ 2.67GHz). \(^{\text{b}}\)Two molecules running in parallel