Skip to main content

Table 8 Overall performance of the final non-linear models for case study 4

From: QSAR-Co-X: an open source toolkit for multitarget QSAR modelling

Classification b

RF (without HPOc/QSAR-Co)d

RF (with HPO/QSAR-Co-X)

GB (with HPO/QSAR-Co-X)

Str(tenfold CV)e

Tsf

Vdg

Str(tenfold CV)e

Tsf

Vd g

Str (tenfold CV)e

Tsf

Vdg

TP

994

431

341

969

433

343

996

443

346

TN

953

405

317

936

405

316

949

406

318

FP

46

17

10

63

17

11

50

16

9

FN

44

20

14

69

18

12

42

8

9

Sn (%)

95.76

95.57

96.06

93.35

95.97

96.64

95.95

96.21

97.46

Sp (%)

95.4

95.97

96.94

93.69

96.01

96.62

94.99

98.22

97.25

Acc (%)

95.58

91.52

96.48

93.52

95.99

96.63

95.48

97.25

97.36

MCCh

0.912

0.915

0.93

0.884

0.920

0.932

0.91

0.945

0.947

  1. aThe most significant results are highlighted in bold. QSAR-Co-X were generated using random state 1 in Module 2 of the toolkit
  2. bTP: True positive, TN: True negative, FP: False positive, FN: False negative, Sn: Sensitivity, Sp: Specificity, Acc: Accuracy
  3. cHPO: Hyperparameter optimisation
  4. dModel previously reported in [15]
  5. eSub-training set
  6. fTest set
  7. gValidation set
  8. hMatthews correlation coefficient