Skip to main content

Table 5 Results on the test set for the ML models trained and validated on the combined PC-3/DU-145 dataset (PCC = 95)

From: Development of machine learning classifiers to predict compound activity on prostate cancer cell lines

Cell line

PC-3

DU-145

Algorithm

SVM

RF

KNN

SVM

RF

KNN

Activity threshold method

GAP 20

FIX 50

GAP 20

FIX 50

GAP 20

FIX 50

GAP 20

FIX 50

GAP 20

FIX 50

GAP 20

FIX 50

N compounds

461

587

461

587

461

587

485

586

485

586

485

586

N active

286

351

286

351

286

351

286

336

286

336

286

336

N inactive

175

236

175

236

175

236

199

250

199

250

199

250

Accuracy

0.65

0.65

0.67

0.65

0.64

0.63

0.66

0.66

0.67

0.65

0.64

0.63

Precision

0.85

0.82

0.81

0.74

0.80

0.73

0.83

0.79

0.78

0.72

0.74

0.71

Recall

0.54

0.53

0.61

0.63

0.57

0.58

0.54

0.54

0.61

0.63

0.58

0.59

F1

0.66

0.64

0.69

0.68

0.67

0.65

0.65

0.64

0.69

0.67

0.65

0.65

MCC

0.38

0.36

0.36

0.30

0.33

0.27

0.38

0.36

0.36

0.29

0.29

0.27

ROCAUC

0.69

0.68

0.68

0.65

0.67

0.64

0.69

0.68

0.68

0.65

0.65

0.64

TNR

0.84

0.82

0.76

0.68

0.76

0.69

0.84

0.81

0.75

0.66

0.71

0.68

FPR

0.16

0.18

0.24

0.32

0.24

0.31

0.16

0.19

0.25

0.34

0.29

0.32

FNR

0.46

0.47

0.39

0.37

0.43

0.42

0.46

0.46

0.39

0.37

0.42

0.41

TPR

0.54

0.53

0.61

0.63

0.57

0.58

0.54

0.54

0.61

0.63

0.58

0.59