Skip to main content

Table 2 Top-k accuracy of rxn-ebm and RetroRanker over RetroXpert and GLN

From: RetroRanker: leveraging reaction changes to improve retrosynthesis prediction through re-ranking

Rank

RetroXpert

GLN

Original

rxn-ebm

RetroRanker*

Original

rxn-ebm

RetroRanker\(^{\dag }\)

Top-1

45.8 ± 0.3

42.7 ± 0.3

47.3 ± 0.7 (+4.6\(^{\ddag }\))

51.7 ± 0.3

52.3 ± 0.0

52.1 ± 0.5 (-0.2)

Top-3

59.2 ± 0.3

62.0 ± 0.2

64.4 ± 0.7 (+2.4)

67.8 ± 0.4

74.9 ± 0.3

74.9 ± 0.2 (+0.0)

Top-5

63.0 ± 0.6

67.6 ± 0.1

70.3 ± 0.2 (+2.7)

75.1 ± 0.3

82.0 ± 0.2

82.7 ± 0.2 (+0.7)

Top-10

66.9 ± 0.3

73.0 ± 0.3

75.7 ± 0.2 (+2.7)

83.2 ± 0.1

88.0 ± 0.0

89.3 ± 0.2 (+1.3)

Top-20

69.9 ± 0.6

75.9 ± 0.1

77.1 ± 0.3 (+1.2)

88.9 ± 0.1

91.4 ± 0.1

92.1 ± 0.2 (+0.7)

Top-50

73.0 ± 0.7

77.3 ± 0.2

77.3 ± 0.3 (+0.0)

92.4 ± 0.1

93.0 ± 0.1

93.2 ± 0.1 (+0.2)

  1. \(^{*}\) The re-ranking strategy is \(S1(90\%, 0)\) and the GNN backbone is AttentiveFP
  2. \(^{\dag }\) The re-ranking strategy is \(S2(90\%, 0)\) and the GNN backbone is AttentiveFP
  3. \(^{\ddag }\) Numbers in parentheses denote the improvement over rxn-ebm. The RetroRanker models are trained based on the same single-step proposals with rxn-ebm