Skip to main content

Table 4 Top-k accuracy \((\%)\) after re-ranking on USPTO-full

From: RetroRanker: leveraging reaction changes to improve retrosynthesis prediction through re-ranking

Models

Top-1

Top-3

Top-5

Top-10

RetroSim

32.8

–

–

74.1

GLN

39.3

–

–

63.7

LocalRetro

39.1

53.3

58.4

63.7

AT

47.6

62.4

66.7

70.7

AT+RetroRanker\(^{*}\)

48.0 (+0.4)

64.1 (+1.7)

68.5 (+1.8)

71.7 (+1.0)

AT+RetroRanker\(^{\dagger }\)

48.8 (+1.2)

64.7 (+2.3)

68.8 (+2.1)

71.7 (+1.0)

R-SMILES

48.9

66.5

71.8

76.8

R-SMILES+RetroRanker\(^{\dagger }\)

49.0 (+0.1)

67.2 (+0.7)

72.6 (+0.8)

77.3 (+0.5)

  1. \(^{*}\) The re-ranking strategy is \(S2(100\%, 0)\), the GNN backbone is Graphormer, and the model is trained based on the predictions of AT
  2. \(^{\dagger }\) The re-ranking strategy is \(S2(100\%, 0)\), the GNN backbone is Graphormer, and the model is trained based on the predictions of R-SMILES