Skip to main content

Table 1 Test set predictive performance

From: Explaining compound activity predictions with a substructure-aware loss for graph neural networks

 

Avg. RMSE

W. Avg. RMSE

Avg. PCC

W. Avg. PCC

RF

\(0.35\, (\pm 0.11)\)

\(0.30\, (\pm 0.08)\)

\(0.95\, (\pm 0.07)\)

\(0.96\, (\pm 0.04)\)

GNN \({\mathcal {L}}_{\text{MSE}}\)

\(0.34\, (\pm 0.23)\)

\(0.25\, (\pm 0.13)\)

\(0.89\, (\pm 0.23)\)

\(0.96\, (\pm 0.08)\)

GNN \({\mathcal {L}}_{\mathrm {MSE+AC}}\)

\(0.31\, (\pm 0.24)\)

\(0.24\, (\pm 0.13)\)

\(0.89\, (\pm 0.23)\)

\(0.96\, (\pm 0.07)\)

GNN \({\mathcal {L}}_{\mathrm {MSE+UCN}}\)

\(0.47\, (\pm 0.28)\)

\(0.37\, (\pm 0.14)\)

\(0.84\, (\pm 0.24)\)

\(0.93\, (\pm 0.08)\)

  1. Reported are the average (Avg.) and weighted average (W. Avg., over number of compounds per target) of root mean squared error (RMSE) and Pearson’s correlation coefficient (PCC) values (± 1 standard deviation)