Skip to main content

Table 1 Accuracies and F-scores of the different models trained on Rhea and ECREACT

From: An explainability framework for deep learning on chemical reactions exemplified by enzyme-catalysed reaction classification

Model

Accuracy

F-Score

Training Time

Energy Use

ECXRhea

\(0.98\pm eq0.00\)

\(0.97\pm 0.01\)

100 s

43 Wh

ECXYRhea

\(0.96\pm 0.01\)

\(0.88\pm 0.02\)

160 s

70 Wh

ECXYZRhea

\(0.95\pm 0.00\)

\(0.87\pm 0.02\)

190 s

82 Wh

ECXECREACT

\(0.98\pm 0.00\)

\(0.96\pm 0.00\)

2090 s

904 Wh

ECXYECREACT

\(0.95\pm 0.00\)

\(0.82\pm 0.01\)

2170 s

936 Wh

ECXYZECREACT

\(0.93\pm 0.00\)

\(0.77\pm 0.01\)

2810 s

1,216 Wh

  1. The energy use is calculated based on the energy use of the device (Dell XPS 15, i7-12700 H CPU, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Laptop GPU) and includes the power usage of models trained for 4x cross-validation and four experiments with fingerprint variations. The hyperparameter values were taken from the previous work on organic reactions [44]. The total resulting energy consumption for model experimentation, training, and validation for this project was 3.25 kWh. Energy mix (2022): 65% hydro, 23% solar, and 12% other renewables