Skip to main content

Table 3 Performance comparison results of RDKit descriptor-based predictive models on the test sets of 354 kinases

From: Large-scale comparison of machine learning methods for profiling prediction of kinase inhibitors

Molecular feature

Method

AUCg

F1 scoreh

BAi

RDKitDes

RFa

0.798 ± 0.120

0.759 ± 0.225

0.650 ± 0.113

NBb

0.763 ± 0.099

0.739 ± 0.155

0.681 ± 0.090

SVMc

0.727 ± 0.206

0.723 ± 0.245

0.611 ± 0.165

KNNd

0.774 ± 0.116

0.776 ± 0.186

0.684 ± 0.104

XGBooste

0.755 ± 0.148

0.747 ± 0.216

0.650 ± 0.117

DNNf

0.718 ± 0.180

0.693 ± 0.254

0.589 ± 0.117

Mean

0.756 ± 0.030

0.740 ± 0.029

0.644 ± 0.038

  1. a RF: Random forest
  2. b NB: Naïve Bayesian
  3. c SVM: Support vector machine
  4. d KNN: K-Nearest Neighbor
  5. e XGBoost: Extreme gradient boosting
  6. f DNN: Deep neural networks
  7. g AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve
  8. h F1 scores: F1-measure
  9. i BA: Balanced accuracy. “ ± ” values represent standard deviations