Skip to main content

Table 4 Performance comparison results of different graphs-based DL models on the test sets

From: Large-scale comparison of machine learning methods for profiling prediction of kinase inhibitors

Molecular feature

Method

AUCg

F1 scoreh

BAi

Molecular graphs

GCNa

0.729 ± 0.206

0.658 ± 0.271

0.604 ± 0.127

GATb

0.675 ± 0.225

0.636 ± 0.272

0.582 ± 0.145

MPNNc

0.658 ± 0.202

0.621 ± 0.298

0.557 ± 0.128

Attentive FPd

0.674 ± 0.207

0.661 ± 0.295

0.581 ± 0.116

Chemprope

0.717 ± 0.173

0.640 ± 0.291

0.573 ± 0.108

FP-GNNf

0.704 ± 0.223

0.627 ± 0.367

0.604 ± 0.142

Mean

0.693 ± 0.028

0.641 ± 0.016

0.584 ± 0.018

  1. a GCN: Graph convolutional network
  2. b GAT: Graph attention network
  3. c MPNN: Message passing neural networks
  4. d Attentive FP
  5. e Chemprop: D-MPNN
  6. f FP-GNN
  7. g AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristics curve
  8. h F1 scores: F1-measure
  9. iBA: Balanced accuracy. “ ± ” values represent standard deviations