Skip to main content

Table 4 Results for the best performance of each optimized ML model

From: POSEIDON: Peptidic Objects SEquence-based Interaction with cellular DOmaiNs: a new database and predictor

Model

Subset

RMSE

MSE

MAE

Pearson

Spearman

r2

Support vector machine

Train

0.550

0.303

0.318

0.918

0.943

0.817

Test

0.717

0.514

0.485

0.856

0.887

0.706

Stochastic gradient descent

Train

0.002

0.002

Test

0.002

0.002

k-nearest neighbors

Train

0.419

0.175

0.263

0.946

0.942

0.894

Test

0.746

0.557

0.572

0.828

0.823

0.681

Decision tree

Train

0.690

0.476

0.488

0.844

0.824

0.712

Test

0.951

0.904

0.669

0.704

0.707

0.483

Random forest

Train

0.397

0.158

0.259

0.958

0.961

0.905

Test

0.700

0.490

0.452

0.856

0.869

0.720

Extreme randomized trees

Train

0.527

0.277

0.349

0.915

0.924

0.832

Test

0.765

0.585

0.522

0.819

0.830

0.665

Extreme gradient boosting

Train

0.177

0.031

0.098

0.991

0.989

0.981

Test

0.643

0.413

0.394

0.874

0.881

0.764

Deep neural network

Train

0.259

0.067

0.153

0.980

0.979

0.959

Test

0.640

0.410

0.402

0.876

0.880

0.765

Forked neural network

Train

0.358

0.128

0.199

0.961

0.960

0.923

Test

0.740

0.547

0.447

0.839

0.857

0.687