Skip to main content
  • Oral presentation
  • Open access
  • Published:

Towards targeting protein-protein interfaces with small molecules

A promising way to interfere with biological processes is through the control of protein-protein interactions by means of small molecules that modulate the formation of protein-protein complexes. Although the feasibility of this approach has been demonstrated in principle by recent results, many of the small-molecule modulators known to date have not been found by rational design approaches. In large part this is due to the challenges that one faces in dealing with protein binding epitopes compared to, e.g., enzyme binding pockets.

Recent advances in the understanding of the energetics and dynamics of protein binding interfaces[1] and methodological developments in the field of structure-based drug design methods may open up a way to apply rational design approaches also for finding protein-protein interaction modulators.2 Here, we first show in a retrospective analysis of the well-investigated interleukin-2 system how I) potential binding sites in an interface can be identified from an unbound protein structure, II) the interface can be dissected in terms of energetic contributions of single residues, and III) one can make use of this knowledge for guiding the development of small-molecule modulators. When applied to a leukaemia-associated fusion protein in a prospective manner, the predictive character of the methodology is demonstrated [2].

Another challenge arises from the fact that protein-protein interfaces are flexible. In the second part, we thus demonstrate a novel approach for including protein flexibility into protein-ligand docking[3]. This approach is based on elastic potential grids, which provide an accurate and efficient representation of intermolecular interactions in fully-flexible docking.

References

  1. Gonzalez Ruiz D, Gohlke H: Targeting protein-protein interactions with small molecules: Challenges and perspectives for computational binding epitope detection and ligand finding. Curr. Med. Chem. 2006, 13: 2607-2625. 10.2174/092986706778201530.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wichmann C, Gohlke H, Grez M: Dimer-tetramer transition controls RUNX1/ETO leukemogenic activity. Blood. 2010, 116: 603-613. 10.1182/blood-2009-10-248047.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kazemi S, Krueger DM, Sirockin F, Gohlke H: Elastic potential grids: Accurate and efficient representation of intermolecular interactions for fully-flexible docking. ChemMedChem. 2009, 4: 1264-1268. 10.1002/cmdc.200900146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Holger Gohlke.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gohlke, H., Metz, A., Pfleger, C. et al. Towards targeting protein-protein interfaces with small molecules. J Cheminform 3 (Suppl 1), O21 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-3-S1-O21

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1758-2946-3-S1-O21

Keywords